<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GranneBlog &#187; fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.granneman.com/tag/fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.granneman.com</link>
	<description>Ramblings &#38; ephemera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why we laugh</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/11/06/why-we-laugh/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/11/06/why-we-laugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[language & literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absurdity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Gene Weingarten&#8217;s &#8220;The Peekaboo Paradox: The strange secrets of humor, fear and a guy who makes big money making little people laugh&#8221; (The Washington Post: 22 January 2006): Even before they respond to a tickle, most babies will laugh at peekaboo. It&#8217;s their first &#8220;joke.&#8221; They are reacting to a sequence of events that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Gene Weingarten&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/18/AR2006011801434.html">The Peekaboo Paradox: The strange secrets of humor, fear and a guy who makes big money making little people laugh</a>&#8221; (<em>The Washington Post</em>: 22 January 2006):</p>
<blockquote><p>Even before they respond to a tickle, most babies will laugh at peekaboo. It&#8217;s their first &#8220;joke.&#8221; They are reacting to a sequence of events that begins with the presence of a familiar, comforting face. Then, suddenly, the face disappears, and you can read in the baby&#8217;s expression momentary puzzlement and alarm. When the face suddenly reappears, everything is orderly in the baby&#8217;s world again. Anxiety is banished, and the baby reacts with her very first laugh.</p>
<p>At its heart, laughter is a tool to triumph over fear. As we grow older, our senses of humor become more demanding and refined, but that basic, hard-wired reflex remains. We need it, because life is scary. Nature is heartless, people can be cruel, and death and suffering are inevitable and arbitrary. We learn to tame our terror by laughing at the absurdity of it all.</p>
<p>This point has been made by experts ranging from Richard Pryor to doctoral candidates writing tedious theses on the ontol-ogical basis of humor. Any joke, any amusing observation, can be deconstructed to fit. The seemingly benign Henny Youngman one-liner, &#8220;Take my wife . . . please!&#8221; relies in its heart on an understanding that love can become a straitjacket. By laughing at that recognition, you are rising above it, and blunting its power to disturb.</p>
<p>After the peekaboo age, but before the age of such sophisticated understanding, dwells the preschooler. His sense of humor is more than infantile but less than truly perceptive. He comprehends irony but not sarcasm. He lacks knowledge but not feeling. The central fact of his world &#8212; and the central terror to be overcome &#8212; is his own powerlessness.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/11/06/why-we-laugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All about freezing to death</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/06/30/all-about-freezing-to-death/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/06/30/all-about-freezing-to-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abandoned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clothes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[photo credit: State Library of New South Wales collection From Peter Stark&#8217;s &#8220;As Freezing Persons Recollect the Snow&#8211;First Chill&#8211;Then Stupor&#8211;Then the Letting Go&#8221; (Outside: January 1997): There is no precise core temperature at which the human body perishes from cold. At Dachau&#8217;s cold-water immersion baths, Nazi doctors calculated death to arrive at around 77 degrees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29454428@N08/2963668712/" title="Ice mask, C.T. Madigan / photograph by Frank Hurley" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/2963668712_8f09b249c4_m.jpg" alt="Ice mask, C.T. Madigan / photograph by Frank Hurley" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://www.flickr.com/commons/usage/" title="No known copyright restrictions" target="_blank"><img src="http://blog.granneman.com/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29454428@N08/2963668712/" title="State Library of New South Wales collection" target="_blank">State Library of New South Wales collection</a></small></p>
<p>From Peter Stark&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://outside.away.com/outside/magazine/0197/9701fefreez.html">As Freezing Persons Recollect the Snow&#8211;First Chill&#8211;Then Stupor&#8211;Then the Letting Go</a>&#8221; (<em>Outside</em>: January 1997):</p>
<blockquote><p>There is no precise core temperature at which the human body perishes from cold. At Dachau&#8217;s cold-water immersion baths, Nazi doctors calculated death to arrive at around 77 degrees Fahrenheit. The lowest recorded core temperature in a surviving adult is 60.8 degrees. For a child it&#8217;s lower: In 1994, a two-year-old girl in Saskatchewan wandered out of her house into a minus-40 night. She was found near her doorstep the next morning, limbs frozen solid, her core temperature 57 degrees. She lived.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The cold remains a mystery, more prone to fell men than women, more lethal to the thin and well muscled than to those with avoirdupois, and least forgiving to the arrogant and the unaware.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Were you a Norwegian fisherman or Inuit hunter, both of whom frequently work gloveless in the cold, your chilled hands would open their surface capillaries periodically to allow surges of warm blood to pass into them and maintain their flexibility. This phenomenon, known as the hunter&#8217;s response, can elevate a 35-degree skin temperature to 50 degrees within seven or eight minutes.</p>
<p>Other human adaptations to the cold are more mysterious. Tibetan Buddhist monks can raise the skin temperature of their hands and feet by 15 degrees through meditation. Australian aborigines, who once slept on the ground, unclothed, on near-freezing nights, would slip into a light hypothermic state, suppressing shivering until the rising sun rewarmed them.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The exertion that warmed you on the way uphill now works against you: Your exercise-dilated capillaries carry the excess heat of your core to your skin, and your wet clothing dispels it rapidly into the night. The lack of insulating fat over your muscles allows the cold to creep that much closer to your warm blood.</p>
<p>Your temperature begins to plummet. Within 17 minutes it reaches the normal 98.6. Then it slips below.</p>
<p>At 97 degrees, hunched over in your slow search, the muscles along your neck and shoulders tighten in what&#8217;s known as pre-shivering muscle tone. Sensors have signaled the temperature control center in your hypothalamus, which in turn has ordered the constriction of the entire web of surface capillaries. Your hands and feet begin to ache with cold.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>At 95, you&#8217;ve entered the zone of mild hypothermia. You&#8217;re now trembling violently as your body attains its maximum shivering response, an involuntary condition in which your muscles contract rapidly to generate additional body heat.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>And after this long stop, the skiing itself has become more difficult. By the time you push off downhill, your muscles have cooled and tightened so dramatically that they no longer contract easily, and once contracted, they won&#8217;t relax. You&#8217;re locked into an ungainly, spread-armed, weak-kneed snowplow.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>As you sink back into the snow, shaken, your heat begins to drain away at an alarming rate, your head alone accounting for 50 percent of the loss. The pain of the cold soon pierces your ears so sharply that you root about in the snow until you find your hat and mash it back onto your head.</p>
<p>But even that little activity has been exhausting. You know you should find your glove as well, and yet you&#8217;re becoming too weary to feel any urgency. You decide to have a short rest before going on.</p>
<p>An hour passes. at one point, a stray thought says you should start being scared, but fear is a concept that floats somewhere beyond your immediate reach, like that numb hand lying naked in the snow. You&#8217;ve slid into the temperature range at which cold renders the enzymes in your brain less efficient. With every one-degree drop in body temperature below 95, your cerebral metabolic rate falls off by 3 to 5 percent. When your core temperature reaches 93, amnesia nibbles at your consciousness.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>In the minus-35-degree air, your core temperature falls about one degree every 30 to 40 minutes, your body heat leaching out into the soft, enveloping snow. Apathy at 91 degrees. Stupor at 90.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve now crossed the boundary into profound hypothermia. By the time your core temperature has fallen to 88 degrees, your body has abandoned the urge to warm itself by shivering. Your blood is thickening like crankcase oil in a cold engine. Your oxygen consumption, a measure of your metabolic rate, has fallen by more than a quarter. Your kidneys, however, work overtime to process the fluid overload that occurred when the blood vessels in your extremities constricted and squeezed fluids toward your center. You feel a powerful urge to urinate, the only thing you feel at all.</p>
<p>By 87 degrees you&#8217;ve lost the ability to recognize a familiar face, should one suddenly appear from the woods.</p>
<p>At 86 degrees, your heart, its electrical impulses hampered by chilled nerve tissues, becomes arrhythmic. It now pumps less than two-thirds the normal amount of blood. The lack of oxygen and the slowing metabolism of your brain, meanwhile, begin to trigger visual and auditory hallucinations.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>At 85 degrees, those freezing to death, in a strange, anguished paroxysm, often rip off their clothes. This phenomenon, known as paradoxical undressing, is common enough that urban hypothermia victims are sometimes initially diagnosed as victims of sexual assault. Though researchers are uncertain of the cause, the most logical explanation is that shortly before loss of consciousness, the constricted blood vessels near the body&#8217;s surface suddenly dilate and produce a sensation of extreme heat against the skin.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an adage about hypothermia: &#8220;You aren&#8217;t dead until you&#8217;re warm and dead.&#8221;</p>
<p>At about 6:00 the next morning, his friends, having discovered the stalled Jeep, find him, still huddled inches from the buried log, his gloveless hand shoved into his armpit. The flesh of his limbs is waxy and stiff as old putty, his pulse nonexistent, his pupils unresponsive to light. Dead.</p>
<p>But those who understand cold know that even as it deadens, it offers perverse salvation. Heat is a presence: the rapid vibrating of molecules. Cold is an absence: the damping of the vibrations. At absolute zero, minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit, molecular motion ceases altogether. It is this slowing that converts gases to liquids, liquids to solids, and renders solids harder. It slows bacterial growth and chemical reactions. In the human body, cold shuts down metabolism. The lungs take in less oxygen, the heart pumps less blood. Under normal temperatures, this would produce brain damage. But the chilled brain, having slowed its own metabolism, needs far less oxygen-rich blood and can, under the right circumstances, survive intact.</p>
<p>Setting her ear to his chest, one of his rescuers listens intently. Seconds pass. Then, faintly, she hears a tiny sound&#8211;a single thump, so slight that it might be the sound of her own blood. She presses her ear harder to the cold flesh. Another faint thump, then another.</p>
<p>The slowing that accompanies freezing is, in its way, so beneficial that it is even induced at times. Cardiologists today often use deep chilling to slow a patient&#8217;s metabolism in preparation for heart or brain surgery. In this state of near suspension, the patient&#8217;s blood flows slowly, his heart rarely beats&#8211;or in the case of those on heart-lung machines, doesn&#8217;t beat at all; death seems near. But carefully monitored, a patient can remain in this cold stasis, undamaged, for hours.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>In fact, many hypothermia victims die each year in the process of being rescued. In &#8220;rewarming shock,&#8221; the constricted capillaries reopen almost all at once, causing a sudden drop in blood pressure. The slightest movement can send a victim&#8217;s heart muscle into wild spasms of ventricular fibrillation. In 1980, 16 shipwrecked Danish fishermen were hauled to safety after an hour and a half in the frigid North Sea. They then walked across the deck of the rescue ship, stepped below for a hot drink, and dropped dead, all 16 of them.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The doctor rapidly issues orders to his staff: intravenous administration of warm saline, the bag first heated in the microwave to 110 degrees. Elevating the core temperature of an average-size male one degree requires adding about 60 kilocalories of heat. A kilocalorie is the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of one liter of water one degree Celsius. Since a quart of hot soup at 140 degrees offers about 30 kilocalories, the patient curled on the table would need to consume 40 quarts of chicken broth to push his core temperature up to normal. Even the warm saline, infused directly into his blood, will add only 30 kilocalories.</p>
<p>Ideally, the doctor would have access to a cardiopulmonary bypass machine, with which he could pump out the victim&#8217;s blood, rewarm and oxygenate it, and pump it back in again, safely raising the core temperature as much as one degree every three minutes. But such machines are rarely available outside major urban hospitals.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;d nod if you could. But you can&#8217;t move. All you can feel is throbbing discomfort everywhere. Glancing down to where the pain is most biting, you notice blisters filled with clear fluid dotting your fingers, once gloveless in the snow. During the long, cold hours the tissue froze and ice crystals formed in the tiny spaces between your cells, sucking water from them, blocking the blood supply. You stare at them absently.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think they&#8217;ll be fine,&#8221; a voice from overhead says. &#8220;The damage looks superficial. We expect that the blisters will break in a week or so, and the tissue should revive after that.&#8221;</p>
<p>If not, you know that your fingers will eventually turn black, the color of bloodless, dead tissue. And then they will be amputated.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve seen that in the infinite reaches of the universe, heat is as glorious and ephemeral as the light of the stars. Heat exists only where matter exists, where particles can vibrate and jump. In the infinite winter of space, heat is tiny; it is the cold that is huge.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/06/30/all-about-freezing-to-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Foster Wallace on TV, loneliness, &amp; death</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/05/23/david-foster-wallace-on-tv-loneliness-death/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/05/23/david-foster-wallace-on-tv-loneliness-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language & literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david_foster_wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lonely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Larry McCaffery&#8217;s &#8220;Conversation with David Foster Wallace&#8221; (Dalkey Archive Press at the University of Illinois: Summer 1993): One thing TV does is help us deny that we&#8217;re lonely. With televised images, we can have the facsimile of a relationship without the work of a real relationship. It&#8217;s an anesthesia of &#8220;form.&#8221; The interesting thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Larry McCaffery&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.dalkeyarchive.com/interviews/show/21">Conversation with David Foster Wallace</a>&#8221; (Dalkey Archive Press at the University of Illinois: Summer 1993):</p>
<blockquote><p>One thing TV does is help us deny that we&#8217;re lonely. With televised images, we can have the facsimile of a relationship without the work of a real relationship. It&#8217;s an anesthesia of &#8220;form.&#8221; The interesting thing is why we&#8217;re so desperate for this anesthetic against loneliness. You don&#8217;t have to think very hard to realize that our dread of both relationships and loneliness, both of which are like sub-dreads of our dread of being trapped inside a self (a psychic self, not just a physical self), has to do with angst about death, the recognition that I&#8217;m going to die, and die very much alone, and the rest of the world is going to go merrily on without me.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/05/23/david-foster-wallace-on-tv-loneliness-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open source &amp; patents</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/04/25/open-source-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/04/25/open-source-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech in changing society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Liz Laffan&#8217;s &#8220;GPLv2 vs GPLv3: The two seminal open source licenses, their roots, consequences and repercussions&#8221; (VisionMobile: September 2007): Cumulatively patents have been doubling practically every year since 1990. Patents are now probably the most contentious issue in software-related intellectual property rights. &#8230; However we should also be aware that software written from scratch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Liz Laffan&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.visionmobile.com/research.php">GPLv2 vs GPLv3: The two seminal open source licenses, their roots, consequences and repercussions</a>&#8221; (VisionMobile: September 2007):</p>
<blockquote><p>Cumulatively patents have been doubling practically every year since 1990. Patents are now probably the most contentious issue in software-related intellectual property rights.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>However we should also be aware that software written from scratch is as likely to infringe patents as FOSS covered software – due mainly to the increasing proliferation of patents in all software technologies.  Consequently the risk of patent infringement is largely comparable whether one chooses to write one’s own software or use software covered by the GPLv2; one will most likely have to self-indemnify against a potential patent infringement claim in both cases.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The F.U.D. (fear, uncertainty and doubt) that surrounds patents in FOSS has been further heightened by two announcements, both instigated by Microsoft.  Firstly in November 2006 Microsoft and Novell1  entered into a cross- licensing patent agreement where Microsoft gave Novell assurances that it would not sue the company or its customers if they were to be found infringing Microsoft patents in the Novell Linux distribution.  Secondly in May 2007 Microsoft2  restated (having alluded to the same in 2004) that FOSS violates 235 Microsoft patents. Unfortunately, the Redmond giant did not state which patents in particular were being infringed and nor have they initiated any actions against a user or distributor of Linux.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The FOSS community have reacted to these actions by co-opting the patent system and setting up the Patent Commons (http://www.patentcommons.org). This initiative, managed by the Linux Foundation, coordinates and manages a patent commons reference library, documenting information about patent- related pledges in support of Linux and FOSS that are provided by large software companies. Moreover, software giants such as IBM and Nokia have committed not to assert patents against the Linux kernel and other FOSS projects. In addition, the FSF have strengthened the patent clause of GPLv3&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/04/25/open-source-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Philip Larkin&#8217;s &#8220;Aubade&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/04/18/from-philip-larkins-aubade/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/04/18/from-philip-larkins-aubade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commonplace book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language & literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Philip Larkin&#8217;s &#8220;Aubade&#8220;: I work all day, and get half drunk at night. Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare. In time the curtain edges will grow light. Till then I see what&#8217;s really always there: Unresting death, a whole day nearer now, Making all thought impossible but how And where and when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Philip Larkin&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.boothill.ca/goatwrrld/aubade.html">Aubade</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>I work all day, and get half drunk at night.<br />
Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare.<br />
In time the curtain edges will grow light.<br />
Till then I see what&#8217;s really always there:<br />
Unresting death, a whole day nearer now,<br />
Making all thought impossible but how<br />
And where and when I shall myself die.<br />
Arid interrogation: yet the dread<br />
Of dying, and being dead,<br />
Flashes afresh to hold and horrify.</p>
<p>The mind blanks at the glare. Not in remorse<br />
- The good not used, the love not given, time<br />
Torn off unused &#8211; nor wretchedly because<br />
An only life can take so long to climb<br />
Clear of its wrong beginnings, and may never:<br />
But at the total emptiness forever,<br />
The sure extinction that we travel to<br />
And shall be lost in always. Not to be here,<br />
Not to be anywhere,<br />
And soon; nothing more terrible, nothing more true.</p>
<p>This is a special way of being afraid<br />
No trick dispels. Religion used to try,<br />
That vast moth-eaten musical brocade<br />
Created to pretend we never die,<br />
And specious stuff that says no rational being<br />
Can fear a thing it cannot feel, not seeing<br />
that this is what we fear &#8211; no sight, no sound,<br />
No touch or taste or smell, nothing to think with,<br />
Nothing to love or link with,<br />
The anaesthetic from which none come round.</p>
<p>And so it stays just on the edge of vision,<br />
A small unfocused blur, a standing chill<br />
That slows each impulse down to indecision<br />
Most things may never happen: this one will,<br />
And realisation of it rages out<br />
In furnace fear when we are caught without<br />
People or drink. Courage is no good:<br />
It means not scaring others. Being brave<br />
Lets no-one off the grave.<br />
Death is no different whined at than withstood.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/04/18/from-philip-larkins-aubade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the fundamentalist thinks</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/03/05/how-the-fundamentalist-thinks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/03/05/how-the-fundamentalist-thinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From ScienceDaily&#8217;s &#8220;Brain Differences Found Between Believers In God And Non-believers&#8221; (5 March 2009): In two studies led by Assistant Psychology Professor Michael Inzlicht, participants performed a Stroop task – a well-known test of cognitive control – while hooked up to electrodes that measured their brain activity. Compared to non-believers, the religious participants showed significantly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From ScienceDaily&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090304160400.htm">Brain Differences Found Between Believers In God And Non-believers</a>&#8221; (5 March 2009):</p>
<blockquote><p>In two studies led by Assistant Psychology Professor Michael Inzlicht, participants performed a Stroop task – a well-known test of cognitive control – while hooked up to electrodes that measured their brain activity.</p>
<p>Compared to non-believers, the religious participants showed significantly less activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a portion of the brain that helps modify behavior by signaling when attention and control are needed, usually as a result of some anxiety-producing event like making a mistake. The stronger their religious zeal and the more they believed in God, the less their ACC fired in response to their own errors, and the fewer errors they made.</p>
<p>&#8220;You could think of this part of the brain like a cortical alarm bell that rings when an individual has just made a mistake or experiences uncertainty,&#8221; says lead author Inzlicht, who teaches and conducts research at the University of Toronto Scarborough. &#8220;We found that religious people or even people who simply believe in the existence of God show significantly less brain activity in relation to their own errors. They&#8217;re much less anxious and feel less stressed when they have made an error.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Obviously, anxiety can be negative because if you have too much, you&#8217;re paralyzed with fear,&#8221; [Inzlicht] says. &#8220;However, it also serves a very useful function in that it alerts us when we&#8217;re making mistakes. If you don&#8217;t experience anxiety when you make an error, what impetus do you have to change or improve your behaviour so you don&#8217;t make the same mistakes again and again?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/03/05/how-the-fundamentalist-thinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chemically remove bad memories</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/02/12/chemically-remove-bad-memories/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/02/12/chemically-remove-bad-memories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech in changing society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Nicholas Carr&#8217;s &#8220;Remembering to forget&#8221; (Rough Type: 22 October 2008): Slowly but surely, scientists are getting closer to developing a drug that will allow people to eliminate unpleasant memories. The new issue of Neuron features a report from a group of Chinese scientists who were able to use a chemical &#8211; the protein alpha-CaM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Nicholas Carr&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2008/10/remembering_to.php">Remembering to forget</a>&#8221; (Rough Type: 22 October 2008):</p>
<blockquote><p>Slowly but surely, scientists are getting closer to developing a drug that will allow people to eliminate unpleasant memories. The new issue of Neuron features a report from a group of Chinese scientists who were able to use a chemical &#8211; the protein alpha-CaM kinase II &#8211; to successfully erase memories from the minds of mice. The memory losses, report the authors, are &#8220;not caused by disrupting the retrieval access to the stored information but are, rather, due to the active erasure of the stored memories.&#8221; The erasure, moreover, &#8220;is highly restricted to the memory being retrieved while leaving other memories intact. Therefore, our study reveals a molecular genetic paradigm through which a given memory, such as new or old fear memory, can be rapidly and specifically erased in a controlled and inducible manner in the brain.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>One can think of a whole range of applications, from the therapeutic to the cosmetic to the political.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2009/02/12/chemically-remove-bad-memories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How it feels to drown, get decapitated, get electrocuted, and more</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/08/how-it-feels-to-drown-get-decapitated-get-electrocuted-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/08/how-it-feels-to-drown-get-decapitated-get-electrocuted-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Anna Gosline&#8217;s &#8220;Death special: How does it feel to die?&#8221; (New Scientist: 13 October 2007): Death comes in many guises, but one way or another it is usually a lack of oxygen to the brain that delivers the coup de grâce. Whether as a result of a heart attack, drowning or suffocation, for example, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Anna Gosline&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19626252.800">Death special: How does it feel to die?</a>&#8221; (<em>New Scientist</em>: 13 October 2007):</p>
<blockquote><p>Death comes in many guises, but one way or another it is usually a lack of oxygen to the brain that delivers the coup de grâce. Whether as a result of a heart attack, drowning or suffocation, for example, people ultimately die because their neurons are deprived of oxygen, leading to cessation of electrical activity in the brain &#8211; the modern definition of biological death.</p>
<p>If the flow of freshly oxygenated blood to the brain is stopped, through whatever mechanism, people tend to have about 10 seconds before losing consciousness. They may take many more minutes to die, though, with the exact mode of death affecting the subtleties of the final experience.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<h3>Drowning</h3>
<p>Typically, when a victim realises that they cannot keep their head above water they tend to panic, leading to the classic &#8220;surface struggle&#8221;. They gasp for air at the surface and hold their breath as they bob beneath, says Tipton. Struggling to breathe, they can&#8217;t call for help. Their bodies are upright, arms weakly grasping, as if trying to climb a non-existent ladder from the sea. Studies with New York lifeguards in the 1950s and 1960s found that this stage lasts just 20 to 60 seconds.</p>
<p>When victims eventually submerge, they hold their breath for as long as possible, typically 30 to 90 seconds. After that, they inhale some water, splutter, cough and inhale more. Water in the lungs blocks gas exchange in delicate tissues, while inhaling water also triggers the airway to seal shut &#8211; a reflex called a laryngospasm. &#8220;There is a feeling of tearing and a burning sensation in the chest as water goes down into the airway. Then that sort of slips into a feeling of calmness and tranquility,&#8221; says Tipton, describing reports from survivors.</p>
<p>That calmness represents the beginnings of the loss of consciousness from oxygen deprivation, which eventually results in the heart stopping and brain death.</p>
<h3>Heart attack</h3>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The most common symptom is, of course, chest pain: a tightness, pressure or squeezing, often described as an &#8220;elephant on my chest&#8221;, which may be lasting or come and go. This is the heart muscle struggling and dying from oxygen deprivation. Pain can radiate to the jaw, throat, back, belly and arms. Other signs and symptoms include shortness of breath, nausea and cold sweats.</p>
<p>Most victims delay before seeking assistance, waiting an average of 2 to 6 hours. Women are the worst, probably because they are more likely to experience less well-known symptoms, such as breathlessness, back or jaw pain, or nausea, says JoAnn Manson, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Even small heart attacks can play havoc with the electrical impulses that control heart muscle contraction, effectively stopping it. In about 10 seconds the person loses consciousness, and minutes later they are dead.</p>
<h3>Bleeding to death</h3>
<p>People can bleed to death in seconds if the aorta, the major blood vessel leading from the heart, is completely severed, for example, after a severe fall or car accident.</p>
<p>Death could creep up much more slowly if a smaller vein or artery is nicked &#8211; even taking hours. Such victims would experience several stages of haemorrhagic shock. The average adult has 5 litres of blood. Losses of around 750 millilitres generally cause few symptoms. Anyone losing 1.5 litres &#8211; either through an external wound or internal bleeding &#8211; feels weak, thirsty and anxious, and would be breathing fast. By 2 litres, people experience dizziness, confusion and then eventual unconsciousness.</p>
<h3>Fire</h3>
<p>Long the fate of witches and heretics, burning to death is torture. Hot smoke and flames singe eyebrows and hair and burn the throat and airways, making it hard to breathe. Burns inflict immediate and intense pain through stimulation of the nociceptors &#8211; the pain nerves in the skin. To make matters worse, burns also trigger a rapid inflammatory response, which boosts sensitivity to pain in the injured tissues and surrounding areas.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Most people who die in fires do not in fact die from burns. The most common cause of death is inhaling toxic gases &#8211; carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and even hydrogen cyanide &#8211; together with the suffocating lack of oxygen. One study of fire deaths in Norway from 1996 found that almost 75 per cent of the 286 people autopsied had died from carbon monoxide poisoning.</p>
<p>Depending on the size of the fire and how close you are to it, concentrations of carbon monoxide could start to cause headache and drowsiness in minutes, eventually leading to unconsciousness. According to the US National Fire Protection Association, 40 per cent of the victims of fatal home fires are knocked out by fumes before they can even wake up.</p>
<h3>Decaptitation</h3>
<p>Beheading, if somewhat gruesome, can be one of the quickest and least painful ways to die &#8211; so long as the executioner is skilled, his blade sharp, and the condemned sits still.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Quick it may be, but consciousness is nevertheless believed to continue after the spinal chord is severed. A study in rats in 1991 found that it takes 2.7 seconds for the brain to consume the oxygen from the blood in the head; the equivalent figure for humans has been calculated at 7 seconds. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>It took the axeman three attempts to sever the head of Mary Queen of Scots in 1587. He had to finish the job with a knife.</p>
<p>Decades earlier in 1541, Margaret Pole, the Countess of Salisbury, was executed at the Tower of London. She was dragged to the block, but refused to lay her head down. The inexperienced axe man made a gash in her shoulder rather than her neck. According to some reports, she leapt from the block and was chased by the executioner, who struck 11 times before she died.</p>
<h3>Electrocution</h3>
<p>In accidental electrocutions, usually involving low, household current, the most common cause of death is arrhythmia, stopping the heart dead. Unconsciousness ensues after the standard 10 seconds, says Richard Trohman, a cardiologist at Rush University in Chicago. One study of electrocution deaths in Montreal, Canada found that 92 per cent had probably died from arrhythmia.</p>
<p>Higher currents can produce nearly immediate unconsciousness.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<h3>Fall from a height</h3>
<p>A high fall is certainly among the speediest ways to die: terminal velocity (no pun intended) is about 200 kilometres per hour, achieved from a height of about 145 metres or more. A study of deadly falls in Hamburg, Germany, found that 75 per cent of victims died in the first few seconds or minutes after landing.</p>
<p>The exact cause of death varies, depending on the landing surface and the person&#8217;s posture. People are especially unlikely to arrive at the hospital alive if they land on their head &#8211; more common for shorter (under 10 metres) and higher (over 25 metres) falls. A 1981 analysis of 100 suicidal jumps from the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco &#8211; height: 75 metres, velocity on impact with the water: 120 kilometres per hour &#8211; found numerous causes of instantaneous death including massive lung bruising, collapsed lungs, exploded hearts or damage to major blood vessels and lungs through broken ribs.</p>
<p>Survivors of great falls often report the sensation of time slowing down. The natural reaction is to struggle to maintain a feet-first landing, resulting in fractures to the leg bones, lower spinal column and life-threatening broken pelvises. The impact travelling up through the body can also burst the aorta and heart chambers. Yet this is probably still the safest way to land, despite the force being concentrated in a small area: the feet and legs form a &#8220;crumple zone&#8221; which provides some protection to the major internal organs.</p>
<p>Some experienced climbers or skydivers who have survived a fall report feeling focused, alert and driven to ensure they landed in the best way possible: relaxed, legs bent and, where possible, ready to roll.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<h3>Hanging</h3>
<p>Suicides and old-fashioned &#8220;short drop&#8221; executions cause death by strangulation; the rope puts pressure on the windpipe and the arteries to the brain. This can cause unconsciousness in 10 seconds, but it takes longer if the noose is incorrectly sited. Witnesses of public hangings often reported victims &#8220;dancing&#8221; in pain at the end of the rope, struggling violently as they asphyxiated. Death only ensues after many minutes, as shown by the numerous people being resuscitated after being cut down &#8211; even after 15 minutes.</p>
<p>When public executions were outlawed in Britain in 1868, hangmen looked for a less performance-oriented approach. They eventually adopted the &#8220;long-drop&#8221; method, using a lengthier rope so the victim reached a speed that broke their necks. It had to be tailored to the victim&#8217;s weight, however, as too great a force could rip the head clean off, a professionally embarrassing outcome for the hangman.</p>
<p>Despite the public boasting of several prominent executioners in late 19th-century Britain, a 1992 analysis of the remains of 34 prisoners found that in only about half of cases was the cause of death wholly or partly due to spinal trauma. Just one-fifth showed the classic &#8220;hangman&#8217;s fracture&#8221; between the second and third cervical vertebrae. The others died in part from asphyxiation.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<h3>Lethal injection</h3>
<p>Read full article<br />
Continue reading page |1 |2 |3 |4</p>
<p>Michael Spence, an anthropologist at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada, has found similar results in US victims. He concluded, however, that even if asphyxiation played a role, the trauma of the drop would have rapidly rendered all of them unconscious. &#8220;What the hangmen were looking for was quick cessation of activity,&#8221; he says. &#8220;And they knew enough about their craft to ensure that happened. The thing they feared most was decapitation.&#8221;<br />
Lethal injection</p>
<p>US-government approved, but is it really painless?</p>
<p>Lethal injection was designed in Oklahoma in 1977 as a humane alternative to the electric chair. The state medical examiner and chair of anaesthesiology settled on a series of three drug injections. First comes the anaesthetic thiopental to speed away any feelings of pain, followed by a paralytic agent called pancuronium to stop breathing. Finally potassium chloride is injected, which stops the heart almost instantly.</p>
<p>Each drug is supposed to be administered in a lethal dose, a redundancy to ensure speedy and humane death. However, eyewitnesses have reported inmates convulsing, heaving and attempting to sit up during the procedure, suggesting the cocktail is not always completely effective.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Explosive decompression</p>
<p>In real life there has been just one fatal space depressurisation accident. This occurred on the Russian Soyuz-11 mission in 1971, when a seal leaked upon re-entry into the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere; upon landing all three flight crew were found dead from asphyxiation.</p>
<p>Most of our knowledge of depressurisation comes from animal experiments and the experiences of pilots in accidents at very high altitudes. When the external air pressure suddenly drops, the air in the lungs expands, tearing the fragile gas exchange tissues. This is especially damaging if the victim neglects to exhale prior to decompression or tries to hold their breath. Oxygen begins to escape from the blood and lungs.</p>
<p>Experiments on dogs in the 1950s showed that 30 to 40 seconds after the pressure drops, their bodies began to swell as the water in tissues vaporised, though the tight seal of their skin prevented them from &#8220;bursting&#8221;. The heart rate rises initially, then plummets. Bubbles of water vapour form in the blood and travel through the circulatory system, obstructing blood flow. After about a minute, blood effectively stops circulating.</p>
<p>Human survivors of rapid decompression accidents include pilots whose planes lost pressure, or in one case a NASA technician who accidentally depressurised his flight suit inside a vacuum chamber. They often report an initial pain, like being hit in the chest, and may remember feeling air escape from their lungs and the inability to inhale. Time to the loss of consciousness was generally less than 15 seconds.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/08/how-it-feels-to-drown-get-decapitated-get-electrocuted-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Storm botnet defeats anti-virus programs</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/07/how-the-storm-botnet-defeats-anti-virus-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/07/how-the-storm-botnet-defeats-anti-virus-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech in changing society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defeat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Lisa Vaas&#8217; &#8220;Storm Worm Botnet Lobotomizing Anti-Virus Programs&#8221; (eWeek: 24 October 2007): According to an Oct. 22 posting by Sophos analyst Richard Cohen, the Storm botnet &#8211; Sophos calls it Dorf, and its also known as Ecard malware &#8211; is dropping files that call a routine that gets Windows to tell it every time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Lisa Vaas&#8217; &#8220;<a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Storm-Worm-Botnet-Lobotomizing-AntiVirus-Programs/">Storm Worm Botnet Lobotomizing Anti-Virus Programs</a>&#8221; (<em>eWeek</em>: 24 October 2007):</p>
<blockquote><p>According to an Oct. 22 posting by Sophos analyst Richard Cohen, the Storm botnet &#8211; Sophos calls it Dorf, and its also known as Ecard malware &#8211; is dropping files that call a routine that gets Windows to tell it every time a new process is started. The malware checks the process file name against an internal list and kills the ones that match &#8211; sometimes. But Storm has taken a new twist: It now would rather leave processes running and just patch entry points of loading processes that might pose a threat to it. Then, when processes such as anti-virus programs run, they simply return a value of 0.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The strategy means that users wont be alarmed by their anti-virus software not running. Even more ominously, the technique is designed to fool NAC (network access control) systems, which bar insecure clients from registering on a network by checking to see whether a client is running anti-virus software and whether its patched.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Its the latest evidence of why Storm is &#8220;the scariest and most substantial threat&#8221; security researchers have ever seen, he said. Storm is patient, its resilient, its adaptive in that it can defeat anti-virus products in multiple ways (programmatically, it changes its signature every 30 minutes), its invisible because it comes with a rootkit built in and hides at the kernel level, and its clever enough to change every few weeks.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Hence the hush-hush nature of research around Storm. Corman said he can tell us that its now accurately pegged at 6 million, but he cant tell us who came up with the figure, or how. Besides retribution, Storms ability to morph means that those who know how to watch it are jealously guarding their techniques. &#8220;None of the researchers wanted me to say anything about it,&#8221; Corman said. &#8220;They&#8217;re afraid of retaliation. They fear that if we disclose their unique means of finding information on Storm,&#8221; the botnet herder will change tactics yet again and the window into Storm will slam shut.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/07/how-the-storm-botnet-defeats-anti-virus-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hallucinating the presence of the dead</title>
		<link>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/07/hallucinating-the-presence-of-the-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/07/hallucinating-the-presence-of-the-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Granneman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.granneman.com/?p=1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Vaughan Bell&#8217;s &#8220;Ghost Stories: Visits from the Deceased&#8221; (Scientific American: 2 December 2008): The dead stay with us, that much is clear. They remain in our hearts and minds, of course, but for many people they also linger in our senses—as sights, sounds, smells, touches or presences. Grief hallucinations are a normal reaction to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Vaughan Bell&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ghost-stories-visits-from-the-deceased">Ghost Stories: Visits from the Deceased</a>&#8221; (<em>Scientific American</em>: 2 December 2008):</p>
<blockquote><p>The dead stay with us, that much is clear. They remain in our hearts and minds, of course, but for many people they also linger in our senses—as sights, sounds, smells, touches or presences. Grief hallucinations are a normal reaction to bereavement but are rarely discussed, because people fear they might be considered insane or mentally destabilised by their loss. As a society we tend to associate hallucinations with things like drugs and mental illness, but we now know that hallucinations are common in sober healthy people and that they are more likely during times of stress.</p>
<p>Mourning seems to be a time when hallucinations are particularly common, to the point where feeling the presence of the deceased is the norm rather than the exception. One study, by the researcher Agneta Grimby at the University of Goteborg, found that over 80 percent of elderly people experience hallucinations associated with their dead partner one month after bereavement, as if their perception had yet to catch up with the knowledge of their beloved’s passing. As a marker of how vivid such visions can seem, almost a third of the people reported that they spoke in response to their experiences. In other words, these weren’t just peripheral illusions: they could evoke the very essence of the deceased.</p>
<p>Occasionally, these hallucinations are heart-rending. A 2002 case report by German researchers described how a middle aged woman, grieving her daughter’s death from a heroin overdose, regularly saw the young girl and sometimes heard her say “Mamma, Mamma!” and “It’s so cold.” Thankfully, these distressing experiences tend to be rare, and most people who experience hallucinations during bereavement find them comforting, as if they were re-connecting with something of the positive from the person’s life. Perhaps this reconnecting is reflected in the fact that the intensity of grief has been found to predict the number of pleasant hallucinations, as has the happiness of the marriage to the person who passed away.</p>
<p>There are hints that the type of grief hallucinations might also differ across cultures. Anthropologists have told us a great deal about how the ceremonies, beliefs and the social rituals of death differ greatly across the world, but we have few clues about how these different approaches affect how people experience the dead after they have gone.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.granneman.com/2008/12/07/hallucinating-the-presence-of-the-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
